(You know, I do love the whooshing sound deadlines make when they go whizzing by.)
After much thought and the fact that I have way too much stuff on my plate to get everything done in time, I have to put a less obsessive-compulsive/anal retentive analysis on here, to get this post off of my to-do list and to share with you my personal decision.
We’re not going to have number 2 just yet.
Typically, I would have written something like a thousand words, brought out suspense, but the Decision is really, when I feel like I could handle another kid and Billy can handle a sibling, that is when we will have another kid. (I’m all for adopting too, especially since I just spent the past year breastfeeding, effectively reducing my rate for breast cancer by something like 20%, and I like to look hot. I mean, who doesn’t want to be a MILF? Wait a minute, I digress.) There is no dramatic or definitive date for it, we just want our lives to be a little less chaotic and more routine and until our family settles into our new home (another entry, why do I do this to myself?) we’re not going to try anytime soon. However, this decision came out of a huge outpour of supportive moms from Baltimore (I <3 Baltimore moms!) who were willing to give me their personal experiences and my lame internet research. As a result, I’ve placed the variables that make this decision below and a conclusive statement about, well, how to make this decision.
Variable 1: Your Fertility and Pregnancy
Several mommies told me that their decision to have two under two was simply that they knew their biological clock was running our and they wanted to have the two themselves. This was the basis of having two under two, to make sure that they could physically handle it.
However, there is a study that argues to wait, such that the babies are at least 18 months apart, to reduce the chances of “adverse perinatal outcomes” and not to wait longer than 59 months apart, as waiting longer increases the chances of said “adverse perinatal outcomes.” Though this makes sense, if you are say close to a non-child bearing age, you might want to talk to a doctor/fertility specialist to really feel at the statistics.
There is also an argument for those that had horrible horrible pregnancies and labors that they wanted to wait, simply to make sure they could physically (and sometimes emotionally) handle this.
I considered this to be the most important factor for me. It was something that I knew most moms would agree with– if your health or the health of your baby is effected, then it’s something that you should consider seriously and definitely talk with your doctor about it.
Variable 2: Personality/Health of Your Children and also, Variable 3: Your Sibling Relationships
(Billy is getting out of separation anxiety, but now screams for everything. I wonder if he’s a bit high strung. I wouldn’t blame him, I probably screamed a lot as a baby too because I’m extremely high strung. But if I have two screamers, I think I might …. Once again, I digress.)
A huge argument for having two close together, and the only definitive, non-fertility based argument I have heard is that they play better together and have better relationships with each other, which, according to three pysch professionals and doctor, I was told was complete and utter bunk. I was also told by three other moms that were spaced 4 years or more apart that they see that their relationship with their siblings now, and compared to their peers or ahem, husbands, they felt it was much closer.
I have that exact same experience!
My sister is 8 years younger than me. We send messages/emails all the time to each other and chat for hours every week or so. It’s great. I love her to death. We go shopping together, watch movies together, joke about mom together– I love my sister. My peer/husband is two years apart from his sister and they never go shopping together, but he hates shopping so that might explain it. So your sibling relationships will effect your decision in the long run.
Anyhow, what the professionals say, and what my lame research on the internet says is that it has a lot to do with the personality of the children. If your kids are happy go-lucky, great. If not, well, you made your bed. Now get some coffee and forget about sleeping in it. So spacing them close together isn’t so great in that situation. If your kid has health issues, spacing them apart is good so that you can be there for your kid.
My kid is (thank the universe) healthy. But he is a bit high strung. Waiting is probably a good thing. But I’m a little biased.
Love you sis!
Variable 4: Your Happiness
The biggest response I got out of this is: DO WHAT WILL MAKE YOUR FAMILY HAPPY. In all caps. For emphasis, you know.
If you want to enjoy just having one, do it. If you want to have two and have your body back, do that. Whatever you think will make you happy, do that.
I think I may just adopt number 2 at this point.
Variable 5: Psych Studies
Three years apart is what the professionals recommend (according to said lame internet research) because they have time with you and time to individualize and dethroning isn’t as bad. So based on personalities, there you go.
There was this one study though, in 1975 saying that the closer to age they are, the more intimate they become as siblings.
And then there was this study that the farther apart they are, the more smarter they are.
And then there was this study that the farther apart they are, they are more like only children.
Did I mention that these studies are typically flawed in some way and get disproven all the time? Yeah, it’s cause we’re human. We have lots of variables. We are not fruit flies. Or bacteria.
What I do want to say about the psych studies is that they do indicate one thing to me: there are a lot of people in the world trying to figure out how to space their progeny. I mean come on, I’m writing this thing and you’re reading it, right? You may have googled something like “when to have kid 2″ and stumbled upon this lame-o blog. And you’ll probably go out and read some more crap about it.
Conclusive Statement
But here’s the deal: It doesn’t freaking matter when you have kid two.
This is the one thing that dawned on me at the end of all of this. No one is going to say they regret the spacing of their kids. (There was one, but I think she was having a bad day.) You are going to love your children. They are parental crack. And no matter what happens in your life you’re going to make the best of what you’ve got.
So you can make plans, make decisions, and know one thing:
The Universe has a wicked sense of humor.
http://www.catapultmagazine.com/family-planning/article/one-kid-two-kids-three-kids-four
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E5DF1739F93BA15756C0A963948260&sec=health&spon=&pagewanted=all
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/09/earlyshow/living/parenting/main611181.shtml
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/295/15/1809
http://www.parenting.com/article/Toddler/Relationships/The-Right-Way-to-Space-Siblings-For-You/3
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999938,00.html
http://www.parents.com/parents/printableStory.jsp?storyid=/templatedata/parents/story/data/1191600078741.xml&catref=cat4620006
http://www.askmoxie.org/2007/06/reader_call_spa.html
http://blogs.wsj.com/juggle/2007/07/10/optimal-spacing-for-siblings/